Tuesday, March 25, 2025

Rereading Anna Karenina

I reread Anna Karenina. The book didn't live up to the hype I gave it the first reading. Below is my review from 2019 when I first read it. Since reading AK for the first time, I have reread War and Peace twice and read more of Tolstoy's nonfiction. I also finished reading The Neapolitan Quartet by Elena Ferrante prior to rereading AK. It might be unfair to any book to have to follow Ferrante's Quartet!

Overall, I dropped AK from 5 stars to 3 stars. I still liked it, but the characters all kind of sucked in one way or another. I think this was very intentional by Tolstoy. Tolstoy thought the elites sucked. It's clear to see now after learning more about Tolstoy.

Below is my original 2019 5 Star Review

Anna Karenina has all the drama and philosophy of War and Peace. Pending a reread of War and Peace, I like Anna Karenina better.

The relationships, character perspectives, and descriptions are perfect. Most books I read now, I can critique and find problems with. Tolstoy is flawless. His descriptions don't drag. The ideas are still fresh and relevant; it's hard to believe it was written 150 years ago. From feminism to class issues to existential crises, the book keeps you engaged and caring about all the characters and relationships. It's hard for me to care about rich people, but Tolstoy pulled it off!

The juxtaposition between the main characters and two main relationships provide a lot of food for thought both literally and philosophically. The story was originally called Two Marriages. Good call changing it, that titled sucks.

Thursday, March 13, 2025

2025 5 Star Rereads

Update on a previous post. I want to reread all my favorite books. My friend AJ joined me. We were on a roll for a few months and then fell off. We are currently almost done with Anna Karenina.

5 Stars Leftovers from 2024 Reread
  • Half a Yellow Sun
  • Waiting for the Barbarians
  • Zen in the Martial Arts
  • Dispatches
  • Song of Solomon

5 Stars Reread Results

Here are my five star rereads that kept their five stars:

The following are still really good, but not five stars after rereading:

Here are the nowhere near five stars:

Friday, March 7, 2025

Reigning in Hell

Background

I'm slowly reading The Odyssey with a friend. There is a great line by Achilles that reminded me of John Milton's Satan from Paradise Lost. These literary giants have opposing ideas about what it means to rule in hell.

Introduction
 
Is it better to reign in hell or serve in heaven? How important is having glory if the cost is dying young/younger?

Milton's Satan on Reigning in Hell
"The mind is its own place, and in it self
Can make a Heav'n of Hell, a Hell of Heav'n. [ 255 ]
What matter where, if I be still the same,
And what I should be, all but less then he
Whom Thunder hath made greater? Here at least
We shall be free; th' Almighty hath not built
Here for his envy, will not drive us hence: [ 260 ]
Here we may reign secure, and in my choyce
To reign is worth ambition though in Hell:
Better to reign in Hell, then serve in Heav'n.
But wherefore let we then our faithful friends,
Th' associates and copartners of our loss [ 265 ]
Lye thus astonisht on th' oblivious Pool,
And call them not to share with us their part
In this unhappy Mansion, or once more
With rallied Arms to try what may be yet
Regaind in Heav'n, or what more lost in Hell? [ 270 ]"
Homer's Achilles on Reigning in Hell
"βουλοίμην κ᾽ ἐπάρουρος ἐὼν θητευέμεν ἄλλῳ,
ἀνδρὶ παρ᾽ ἀκλήρῳ, ᾧ μὴ βίοτος πολὺς εἴη,
ἢ πᾶσιν νεκύεσσι καταφθιμένοισιν ἀνάσσειν."

"I would rather be a laborer working for another man—some poor man who has little to live on—than rule over all the dead who have perished." GPT Literal Translation

A Brief Look at Milton's Interpretations

One way to read Satan is as the hero of Paradise Lost. Satan is the individualistic, defiant hero representing personal freedom. "The mind is its own place." Even if in Hell, in Paradise Lost, Satan has freedom to choose.

The flip side is that Satan is a tragic figure. Satan has deluded himself into thinking the ideas from the previous paragraph are great. His love for his personal freedom creates his downfall. Satan is delusional about the reality of his situation.

Another interpretation that blends the previous two ideas is that Satan is a political allegory for Milton. Milton was a political activist who supported Oliver Cromwell in the Puritan revolution against the monarchy. The monarchy was abolished and King Charles executed. After Cromwell's death, the monarchy was restored and Charles II became king. Milton was arrested, briefly imprisoned, and placed on house arrest. Milton is the fallen and tragic hero. Satan is an allegory for Milton.

Obviously, readers can choose for themselves how to interpret Satan's statement.

A Brief Look at Homer's Interpretation

In Homer's Illiad, Achilles is given the choice between two fates. In book 9, Achilles tells Odysseus, Phoenix, and Ajax:
"For my mother the goddess, silver-footed Thetis, tells me
that two fates sweep me on to my death. If I stay here and fight,
I shall not return alive, but my glory will be undying forever.
If I return home to my dear fatherland, my glory is lost,
but my life will be long, and death will not come to me quickly."
According to what Achilles says, he gets to choose. He eventually chooses kleos (glory) after his friend Patroclus is killed in battle by Hector. Achilles dies young but his glory lives on. (He was played by Brad Pitt in Troy!)

In The Odyssey, when Odysseus goes to the underworld, Achilles has a change of heart or mind, or whatever the dead possess. As the dead, Achilles regrets his kleos. Not only would he have preferred his long peaceful life, he would even prefer the life as a servant of a poor man.
 
The literal reading is Achilles thinks kleos is overrated: life is greater than kleos.
 
Another idea, is that The Iliad and The Odyssey are different stories with different main ideas. The Iliad is a story about the heroics of war and glory of dying in battle. Where The Odyssey is about life and nostos (homecoming). Achilles is a foil character for Odysseus.
 
Another reading is that death striped Achilles of his identity. All his strength, power, and agency are gone. Achilles went from being the baddest dude on the planet to just another dead guy. He has no power or agency. He's just dead, so he is bitter. A interesting note, the other characters in the underworld do not share Achilles's dread, bu they other characters were Achilles.
 
The funnest interpretation is that Achilles is just an angry asshole. If you continuing reading the passage, Achilles seems like his angry self from The Iliad. Achilles is rage and anger, so why shouldn't he be mad and bitter in the underworld?
 
 
Conclusion
 
I love all the passages and lines shared above. I love Miltion's take on Satan. I love Satan's desire for freedom. I love his defiance. I also love how Achilles possibly regrets his kleos.
 
It's not an easy choice for me. I want to be remembered when I'm dead. I do not like the idea of being forgotten, but I don't like the idea of dying either.
 
If given Achilles original fates, I'd choose a long forgettable life. I agree with Satan that the mind is a place. We can create a heaven of hell or a hell of heaven. I'll take my chances with a long life.

 
 
The Odyssey Book 11 lines 489-491 Translations

Samuel Butler (1900) – More Direct, Readable
"Say not a word," he replied, "in death’s favor; I would rather be a paid servant in a poor man's house and be above ground than king of kings among the dead." 
Robert Fitzgerald (1961) – Formal and Poetic
"Let me hear no smooth talk of death from you, Odysseus,
light of councils. Better, I say, to break sod as a farm hand
for some poor country man, on iron rations,
than lord it over all the exhausted dead."
Richmond Lattimore (1965) – More Literal, Preserves Greek Structure
"O shining Odysseus, never try to console me for dying.
I would rather follow the plow as thrall to another
man, one with no land allotted him and not much to live on,
than be a king over all the perished dead."
Robert Fagles (1996) – Lyrical and Poetic
"No winning words about death to me, shining Odysseus!
By god, I’d rather slave on earth for another man—
some dirt-poor tenant farmer who scrapes to keep alive—
than rule down here over all the breathless dead."
Emily Wilson (2018) – Modern, Iambi
"Odysseus, don’t try to sell me on death.
I’d rather be a hired hand back up on earth,
Slaving away for some poor dirt farmer,
Than lord it over all these withered dead."

The Iliad, Book 9, lines 410–416 English Translations:
 
Richmond Lattimore (1951):
"For my mother the goddess, silver-footed Thetis, tells me
that two fates sweep me on to my death. If I stay here and fight,
I shall not return alive, but my glory will be undying forever.
If I return home to my dear fatherland, my glory is lost,
but my life will be long, and death will not come to me quickly."
Robert Fagles (1990):

"Two fates bear me on to the day of death.
If I hold out here and I lay siege to Troy,
my journey home is gone, but my glory never dies.
If I voyage back to the fatherland I love,
my pride, my glory dies…
true, but the life that's left me will be long,
the stroke of death will not come on me quickly."